The world is in the midst of a financing crisis. As world leaders work to mobilize trillions of dollars to meet climate and development goals, expensive public debt is limiting governments’ ability to make long-term investments. A long-term framework for low-interest financing of global public goods is urgently needed.

While debt burdens have increased dramatically almost everywhere, the danger is particularly acute in developing countries, where government debt repayments are growing twice as fast as in developed economies. Faced with unbearable debt repayment burdens, many developing countries cannot make the necessary investments to reduce poverty and adapt to a rapidly warming planet.

For most developing countries, the size of the debt is not the primary issue. In fact, it is too small to support development at the pace required. Moreover, developing countries’ debt is a small proportion of overall global debt, while their debt-to-GDP ratios are often barely half those of richer countries.

The real challenge lies in the structure of the debt. As many bilateral lenders have scaled back their lending capacity over the past two decades, developing countries have had no choice but to rely on private-sector financing that is not suitable for vulnerable borrowers. Meanwhile, exogenous shocks – including the Covid-19 pandemic, climate-related disasters and high inflation – have triggered a sharp rise in interest rates. This has driven up borrowing costs, strained public budgets, and threatened political stability. Even countries that took on minimal levels of debt to fund infrastructure projects are struggling.

The need for affordable finance will only become more acute in the coming years. The Independent High-Level Expert Group on Climate Finance estimates that emerging and developing economies ( excluding China ) will need to mobilize an additional US$2.5 trillion annually by 2030, and US$3.5 trillion by 2035. Similarly, Development Reimagined’s analysis of 13 African countries finds that delivering on the Sustainable Development Goals and the African Union’s Agenda 2063 will require US$109 billion to US$150 billion in annual infrastructure financing.

But instead, according to the Debt Service Watch database, the world’s poorest countries are spending, on average, 50% of their revenue on debt service. Over three billion people currently live in countries that spend more on debt payments than on essential services like health or education.

China’s experience offers valuable insights into how to tackle today’s financing challenges. During a recent visit, we travelled on the high-speed rail from Beijing to the Shandong province, completing the 403-mile journey in just over three hours. This remarkable feat of engineering is a testament to China’s commitment to long-term investment in sustainable development – a strategy that helps explain how 800 million people have been able to lift themselves out of poverty within two generations.

Equally important is China’s recognition of the need for flexibility in managing short-term financing. In November, Chinese Minister of Finance Lan Fo’an announced a 10 trillion yuan ( US$1.4 trillion ) debt swap plan for local governments as part of the government’s fiscal stimulus package. The debt-relief plan, described by Lan as China’s “most significant measure introduced in recent years,” was accompanied by a bond issuance designed to reduce local governments’ debt burdens and free resources to stimulate economic development, boost business confidence, and safeguard public services.

China’s ability to combine long-term investments and adaptive short-term financing provides a useful model for mitigating the current debt crisis and easing tensions between developed-country creditors and developing countries. The G7 countries and multilateral institutions should replace their rigid and outdated approach to sovereign debt, rooted in Western corporate bankruptcy laws and restructuring rules, with a framework that enables governments to respond quickly to unexpected shocks and prevent liquidity shortages from escalating into insolvency crises.

For example, to resolve liquidity problems caused by high borrowing costs, developing countries need support in taking swift, pre-emptive steps to stabilize their debt positions while expanding access to affordable borrowing for productive investments. But achieving this requires reforming the G20’s Common Framework, long hampered by slow implementation and a pro-lender bias. Such an effort should also involve innovative, cross-country fiscal mechanisms, such as currency swap arrangements and the proposed African Stability Mechanism.

The Finance for Development Lab’s Bridge to Climate Action proposal – developed in consultation with a diverse coalition of borrower and lender countries, philanthropic organizations and NGOs – offers one possible solution. It envisions a tripartite deal whereby multilateral development banks would increase climate-linked financing, creditors would agree to reschedule debt, and borrowing countries would be supported in pursuing a strategy for growth based on country-led development plans. The IMF’s “three-pillar approach” incorporates similar principles.

Development Reimagined offers another option. Its ambitious Borrowers Club initiative advocates placing borrowers, rather than lenders, at the centre of the international financial system. Such a shift could facilitate short-term debt relief while making long-term borrowing cheaper through coordinated action.

Other crucial steps include adopting resilient debt instruments, such as disaster clauses and outcome-linked bonds that better tailor private-sector financing for vulnerable borrowers, reforming the International Monetary Fund’s quota system and debt-sustainability assessment process, and overhauling the credit-rating ecosystem.

The solutions are well understood. But without a fairer and more adaptive global financial system, we stand little chance of meeting our climate and development goals. To ensure a just green transition, developing countries must have a stake in the economic opportunities it creates.

Hannah Wanjie Ryder is a CEO of Development Reimagined and a senior associate at the Center for Strategic International Studies Africa Programme; and Kate Hampton is the CEO of the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation.

Copyright: Project Syndicate